INSIGHTS

GetLiquid365 Finance Limited (getliquid365.com): AFM Warning Reveals Earlier Getliquid24 Connection

The regulatory history surrounding GetLiquid365 Finance Limited does not begin with the name GetLiquid365. Months before Dutch authorities warned about getliquid365.com, another remarkably similar trading operation had already appeared on the same regulator’s suspected-boiler-room…

The regulatory history surrounding GetLiquid365 Finance Limited does not begin with the name GetLiquid365. Months before Dutch authorities warned about getliquid365.com, another remarkably similar trading operation had already appeared on the same regulator’s suspected-boiler-room list.

On 15 September 2026, the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) warned consumers not to respond to investment offers from GetLiquid365 Finance Limited. The regulator identifies getliquid365.com and describes the company as a suspected boiler room—a form of online investment fraud.

But there is another significant fact. On 23 June 2026, the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) had already issued a separate suspected-boiler-room warning against Getliquid24 (getliquid24.com).

The connection goes considerably beyond similar names. The telephone number identified in both regulatory warnings is exactly the same: +44 (330) 027 3910. Furthermore, pages on the current GetLiquid365 website contain references to Getliquid24.

That combination creates an unusually important regulatory history for investors trying to establish who actually operates getliquid365.com.


The AFM Calls GetLiquid365 a Suspected Boiler Room

The Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) warning is explicit about the nature of its concern.

The regulator identifies:

  • Name: GetLiquid365 Finance Limited
  • Domain: https://getliquid365.com/
  • Telephone: +44 (330) 027 3910
  • Email: partners@getliquid365.net
  • Email: support@getliquid365.net
  • Germany: Kurfürstendamm 15, 10719 Berlin
  • Switzerland: Bahnhofstrasse 37, 8001 Zürich
  • United Kingdom: Plough Way, Southwark, London, SE16 7DW

The regulator says GetLiquid365 Finance Limited has approached people without being asked in order to offer investment proposals. It describes a boiler room as an operation in which potential investors are approached and pressured into investments promising attractive returns while the underlying investments may be worthless or nonexistent.

Crucially, the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) says it has established that GetLiquid365 Finance Limited does not have an AFM licence or a European Passport.

This therefore goes beyond a situation where a licence simply cannot be located during an independent review. A recognised financial regulator has made a specific suspected-boiler-room finding concerning the exact website.


The Earlier Getliquid24 Warning Changes the Picture

The most important additional discovery is the earlier regulatory record involving Getliquid24.

On 23 June 2026, almost three months before the GetLiquid365 warning, the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) warned consumers against Getliquid24.

That warning identifies:

  • Name: Getliquid24
  • Domain: https://getliquid24.com/
  • Telephone: +44 (330) 027 3910
  • Email: support@getliquid24.net

Once again, the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) classified the operation as a suspected boiler room.

The matching telephone number is particularly significant. Both Getliquid24 and GetLiquid365 Finance Limited are identified by the regulator with +44 (330) 027 3910.

That is substantially stronger evidence of a connection than the similarity between the two names alone.

Retrieve Lost Token has previously examined the importance of identifying connections between changing online investment identities in its Universe.co.com / unified.ee investigation. When domains or branding change, shared infrastructure and contact information can help establish continuity.


Why Does getliquid365.com Still Refer to Getliquid24?

The regulatory connection becomes even harder to dismiss when the current website is examined.

Although the platform is branded GetLiquid365 and its footer identifies the business as GetLiquid365 Finance Limited, material within the website contains references to Getliquid24.

Those references are important because Getliquid24 is not simply an unrelated name discovered elsewhere on the internet. It is the name of the operation the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) had already classified as a suspected boiler room.

The website overlap, combined with the identical telephone number in the two official warnings, provides compelling evidence that investors should examine the two operations together when reconstructing their dealings.

It does not establish the legal identity of every individual behind either website. But it creates a documented connection that should not be ignored.


The GetLiquid365 Website Promises Fast Withdrawals and Easy Funding

The public-facing GetLiquid365 website promotes straightforward access to financial markets.

Its homepage encourages visitors to open a trading account and fund it using an “extensive choice” of deposit methods. Promotional statements emphasise instant deposits, fast withdrawals and low commissions.

The site also provides market-news and analysis material and presents itself as an established trading environment rather than a temporary investment page.

For an investor, this creates an obvious contrast with the regulatory record. The same website promoting easy account funding and fast withdrawals is now specifically identified in a suspected-boiler-room warning.

Professional trading terminology does not establish that the business receiving deposits is authorised. Market charts, financial news and trading interfaces can all be displayed independently of regulatory status.

Retrieve Lost Token examined the same distinction in its Altura FX investigation: a functioning trading interface should not substitute for independent verification of the company controlling customer funds.


Three International Addresses Do Not Establish Regulation

The warning associates GetLiquid365 Finance Limited with addresses in Berlin, Zürich and London.

That geographical spread can create an impression of an established international financial company. Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom are all major financial jurisdictions with recognised regulatory frameworks.

But listing an address in a regulated financial centre does not mean the business itself is regulated there.

Investors should distinguish corporate-location claims from financial-services authorisation. A genuine authorisation should be independently verifiable under the exact legal entity providing the service, with permissions appropriate to the products being offered.

The strongest verified regulatory fact remains the one published by the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM): GetLiquid365 Finance Limited has no AFM licence or European Passport and is suspected of operating as a boiler room.

Retrieve Lost Token addressed a similar problem with international financial branding in its KensingtonGrant investigation, where prestigious-looking corporate presentation had to be separated from independently verified regulatory standing.


Spain and Norway Have Circulated the Dutch Warning

The GetLiquid365 warning has also moved through European regulatory channels.

On 16 September 2026, Spain’s Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV) published GetLiquid365 Finance Limited and getliquid365.com in its list of warnings received from international supervisors.

The Spanish record explicitly identifies the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) as the originating supervisor.

Norway’s Finanstilsynet also carries a market warning for GetLiquid365 Finance Limited and identifies the Netherlands as the issuing country.

These records matter because they extend the visibility of the warning internationally. But they should not be misrepresented as three separate regulators independently investigating the platform.

The substantive suspected-boiler-room finding originates with the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). Spain’s CNMV and Norway’s Finanstilsynet are circulating that warning through their own investor-protection systems.


The Getliquid24 Connection Matters to Existing Customers

Anyone who has already dealt with GetLiquid365 should check old communications for both names.

Search email accounts and messaging histories for GetLiquid365, GetLiquid365 Finance Limited, Getliquid24, getliquid365.com, getliquid365.net, getliquid24.com and getliquid24.net.

Also check whether the telephone number +44 (330) 027 3910 appears in call histories, WhatsApp messages, account-manager communications or payment instructions.

Preserving these connections can help establish whether communications that appeared to come from different trading brands were actually part of the same transaction history.

Do not delete older communications simply because the company name later changed. Earlier messages can be especially useful for establishing when contact began, what returns were promised, which entity supposedly held the account and where payments were directed.


If GetLiquid365 Shows Profits but Blocks Withdrawals

A balance displayed in a GetLiquid365 account should not automatically be treated as evidence that equivalent money is available for withdrawal.

The trading platform controls the information appearing inside its own interface. What matters is whether funds can actually be returned to the investor without unexpected conditions.

If a withdrawal request leads to a demand for additional tax, AML clearance, account verification, insurance, commission, liquidity fees, security deposits or wallet activation charges, verify the demand independently before sending more money.

Not every legitimate fee is fraudulent. But repeated payments demanded solely as a condition for releasing an existing balance are a serious reason for additional scrutiny—particularly when the business involved is already the subject of a suspected-boiler-room warning.

Retrieve Lost Token’s FxTrading Nigeria investigation similarly examined why withdrawal behaviour and the destination of actual payments can become more important than profits displayed on a trading dashboard.


Preserve the Payment Trail Before Contact Is Lost

Anyone who has transferred funds through getliquid365.com should preserve the complete evidence trail immediately.

Save registration emails, trading-account statements, dashboard screenshots, contracts, deposit confirmations, withdrawal requests and communications with account managers. Keep the original telephone numbers, email addresses and website URLs.

For bank transfers, preserve the beneficiary name, receiving bank, account number or IBAN, transfer reference, amount and date. If payments were directed to a company or individual whose name differs from GetLiquid365 Finance Limited, record that difference.

For cryptocurrency transactions, retain the asset type, amount, destination wallet address, transaction hash and transfer date.

Blockchain analysis may allow subsequent movements to be reconstructed and may identify exchanges, payment processors or other services along the transaction path. Tracing does not guarantee recovery, but it can preserve a verifiable transaction history after access to a trading website disappears.

This is why Retrieve Lost Token emphasised payment evidence in its BitNest investigation: once access to funds becomes disputed, the actual movement of money matters more than numbers displayed inside an account.


What the Regulatory Record Establishes

The regulatory evidence against GetLiquid365 Finance Limited is unusually specific.

The Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) identifies getliquid365.com, says the company approached people unsolicited with investment proposals, confirms it lacks an AFM licence or European Passport, and classifies it as a suspected boiler room—a form of online investment fraud.

The same regulator had already issued a separate suspected-boiler-room warning against Getliquid24 (getliquid24.com) on 23 June 2026.

The two warnings contain the identical telephone number +44 (330) 027 3910, while the current GetLiquid365 website itself contains references to Getliquid24. Those facts provide a concrete connection between the two warned operations without requiring speculation about the identities of the individuals controlling them.

Spain’s CNMV and Norway’s Finanstilsynet have subsequently circulated the Dutch warning internationally.


Lost Funds Through GetLiquid365 Finance Limited (getliquid365.com)?

If you lost cryptocurrency, bank-transferred funds or other assets through GetLiquid365 Finance Limited (getliquid365.com), Retrieve Lost Token can assess the transaction trail, investigate connections between payment recipients, trace digital assets where applicable, preserve relevant evidence, and assist with efforts to recover lost funds or assets.

Track Your Recovery Case

Contact Retrieve Lost Token

Preserve records involving both GetLiquid365 and Getliquid24 if either name appeared during your dealings. Wallet addresses, transaction hashes, bank-transfer beneficiaries, withdrawal requests, telephone numbers and communications can help establish where funds were sent and what recovery options may be available.

No upfront recovery fees. Fees apply only after a successful recovery outcome.


Disclaimer

This investigation reports information published by the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM), which identifies GetLiquid365 Finance Limited (getliquid365.com) as a suspected boiler room and states that it lacks an AFM licence or European Passport. The earlier Getliquid24 connection is supported by a separate AFM warning containing the same telephone number. The GetLiquid365 warning has also been circulated by Spain’s CNMV and Norway’s Finanstilsynet. Those republications are not presented as separate findings of fraud. Regulatory warnings are not, by themselves, criminal convictions or court judgments.

Reports reflect the sources and information available at publication. Allegations and regulatory warnings are not court findings. Follow the source links within the published article for context.

Related Insights

Discussion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *